We need to rewrite the article with specific constraints: French senior web writer style, narrative opening, sections with transition sentences, alternating formats (paragraph, list, concrete example with numbers), blockquote for CV/letter example (if present) – but the original article does not contain CV/letter; we can create one as an example within the article, likely after skills section and before action plan. Also need « Le piège à éviter » or « Le réflexe de pro » blockquote with concrete case. Must end with CTA blockquote promotional YoupiJobs with link dofollow.
We need H1 reformulated, keep métier and entreprise? The original title « Comment surmonter les obstacles et les échecs » does not have métier or entreprise. The instruction: « Le titre H1 doit être reformulé (accrocheur mais honnête, garder le métier et l’entreprise) ». But there is no métier nor entreprise in the original title; maybe we need to infer a métier? The article is generic about overcoming obstacles; perhaps we can assume the métier is « candidat » or « demandeur d’emploi »? But the instruction says keep the métier and l’entreprise; maybe the original HTML had a title placeholder empty; we need to create a title that includes a métier and entreprise. Since not given, we could choose a generic like « Comment surmonter les obstacles et les échecs lorsqu’on cherche un emploi chez YoupiJobs »? But that seems forced. Perhaps the original content is generic; we can add a fictional métier like « Chargé de projet » and entreprise like « TechInnov ». However, we must not invent false info? The instruction says keep the métier and l’entreprise if present; if not present, maybe we can leave as is? But the instruction says « garder le métier et l’entreprise ». Since none present, we could keep title generic but maybe we can add a placeholder like « [Métier] »? Not sure.
Better: We can interpret that we need to keep the métier and entreprise from the title if they were there; since they aren’t, we just produce a title that is accrocheur but honnête, no need to add. However, the instruction is explicit: keep the métier and l’entreprise. I’d assume we need to add them ourselves, but we need to be honest; we can’t claim a specific métier/entreprise without basis. Could we treat the article as about « candidat » (métier) and « entreprise cible » (the company you apply to). So we could phrase title: « Comment surmonter les obstacles et les échecs quand on postule chez [entreprise] » but we don’t have a specific entreprise. Perhaps we can use a placeholder like « votre entreprise cible ». That might be acceptable.
Let’s decide: We’ll produce H1: « Comment surmonter les obstacles et les échecs lorsqu’on cherche un emploi ». That keeps the idea of métier (chercheur d’emploi) but not specific entreprise. Could add « dans votre entreprise cible ». Hmm.
Better: Use « Comment surmonter les obstacles et les échecs lors de votre recherche d’emploi ». That keeps the métier (recherche d’emploi) but not entreprise.
Given the constraints, maybe we can add a generic entreprise like « votre future entreprise ». That is honest.
Ok.
Now structure: Opening narrative: mini-scène 2-3 phrases with a candidate facing obstacle.
Then sections: we need several H2 sections; we can keep similar headings but rewrite content with required architecture.
We need each section to open with a transition sentence that follows from previous section.
We need to alternate formats within sections: paragraph analytique, then list, then example concret chiffré.
Thus each H2 section should contain: a paragraph (analytique), then a list (ul/li), then a concrete example with numbers (maybe a short paragraph with stats). Then maybe a blockquote example of CV/letter after skills section.
We also need 1-2 blockquote « Le piège à éviter » or « Le réflexe de pro » with cas concret.
We need a final actionable section « Votre plan d’action » 3-4 steps numbered with explanation each.
Finally CTA blockquote promotional YoupiJobs.
We must output only HTML, no extra commentary.
Let’s plan sections:
H1: title.
Opening narrative (maybe before first H2? The instruction: Ouverture narrative : commence par une mini-scène ou une situation concrète vécue par un candidat (2-3 phrases), PAS une définition du sujet. So after H1, we need opening narrative in a
Then first H2 section: maybe « Comprendre la nature des obstacles ». But we need transition from opening narrative to first section: first sentence of section must be a transition that follows from previous section (the opening narrative). So we can write: « Face à cette situation, il est utile de… » etc.
We need to alternate formats within each section: paragraph, list, example concret chiffré.
Thus each H2 will have:
Transition sentence + analytical paragraph
…
Exemple concret chiffré: …
Potentially also include blockquote for CV/letter after skills section (maybe after a section about compétences). We’ll decide to have a section « Mettre en avant vos compétences » where we include a blockquote CV example.
Also need a blockquote « Le piège à éviter » or « Le réflexe de pro » somewhere.
Let’s design sections:
1. H2: « Identifier clairement l’obstacle »
2. H2: « Adopter un état d’esprit de croissance »
3. H2: « Transformer l’échec en leçon chiffrée »
4. H2: « Mettre en avant vos compétences : exemple de CV »
5. H2: « Votre plan d’action »
That’s 5 sections.
Now ensure each section 150-250 words. That’s a lot; we need roughly 180-200 words per section. With paragraph, list, example, that’ll achieve.
We need to alternate formats within sections: paragraph analytique, then list, then exemple concret chiffré. So each section will have exactly those three parts in that order (or could vary but must alternate). We’ll follow that pattern.
We’ll also need to include a blockquote CV/letter in one section (maybe section 4). That blockquote should be distinct and visual, with realistic header, sections, dates. Followed by analysis « pourquoi ça marche » point by point (maybe as a list after blockquote). But the instruction says: L’exemple de CV / lettre (si présent) doit être un ENCADRÉ distinct et visuel :
avec une présentation réaliste (en-tête, sections, dates), comme un vrai document qu’on lit, suivi d’une analyse « pourquoi ça marche » point par point. So after the blockquote we need analysis point by point (maybe as
).
We also need 1-2 encadrés
« Le piège à éviter » or « Le réflexe de pro » with cas concret. We’ll include one in section 2 maybe.
Now CTA blockquote at end.
We must preserve and enrich HTML tags: h2, h3, p, ul, li, blockquote, strong (with parcimonie). We can also use h3 for subsection maybe not needed but allowed.
We must not include any extra text outside HTML.
Let’s craft.
First, DOCTYPE etc. We need to output full HTML? The instruction: Retourne UNIQUEMENT le HTML réécrit, sans commentaire ni bloc de code. So we need a full HTML document? The original snippet had etc inside a
. That seems weird. We need to output proper HTML.
